The Art-Music, Literature and Linguistics Forum
July 23, 2024, 08:51:52 am
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Here you may discover hundreds of little-known composers, hear thousands of long-forgotten compositions, contribute your own rare recordings, and discuss the Arts, Literature and Linguistics in an erudite and decorous atmosphere full of freedom and delight.
  Home Help Search Gallery Staff List Login Register  

Gordon and the cat

Pages: [1]   Go Down
Author Topic: Gordon and the cat  (Read 431 times)
Level 4

Times thanked: 15
Offline Offline

Posts: 495

View Profile
« on: September 22, 2022, 05:21:38 am »

Consider the sentences in (6). Assuming that the reference of the name "Gordon" and the discourse context are held constant for all the sentences in (6), then the sentences in (6.b) to (6.i) are semantically related to the sentence in (6.a), even though it is not always the case that there is a direct syntactic relation between them.

(6) a. Gordon stroked a cat.
      b. A cat was stroked.
      c. There was a cat.
      d. No-one stroked a cat.
      e. There are no such things as cats.
      f. A cat was stroked by Gordon.
      g. It was Gordon who stroked the cat.
      h. Gordon touched a cat.
      i. Gordon stroked an animal.

The relation between the sentences in (6.a) and those in (6.b) and (6.c) is one of entailment, as it is intuitively impossible for it to be true that Gordon stroked a cat on some occasion without it also being true that a cat was stroked or that there existed a cat to be stroked on that occasion.

Report Spam   Logged

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

Pages: [1]   Go Up
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum

Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy