A couple of members have commented adversely by PM on the "levity" and propensity for inclusion of illustrations here at AMF. The often bi-partitite conversations, particularly regarding "What are you listening to?" has also has been criticised.
I'm sorry, but this is essentially a friendly forum, whose style should suit ALL members. If that chat involves what is (often in extremely illuminating detail) currently being listened to then so be it!
Members are more than welcome to instigate (and thenceforward actively participate in) erudite historio-musicological and analytical discussion here at AMF. Indeed several other forums with this remit exist to my knowledge. Here at AMF members are
encouraged to inaugurate such topics of their choosing, and precipitate responses themselves, but this is not mandatory.
