test only

Nobody could have predicted just what has happened at Hazelwood, and at the moment it appears as if nobody can elucidate it either. That something would occur many have believed ---or will afterwards imagine they believed---and indeed the Simneys are eminently the sort of folk of whom one might expect a scandal. Their history, it has to be admitted, is dubious. And their household is dubious too.

George Simney had gone to Australia as a young man and was believed to have engaged in agricultural pursuits there until the baronetcy fell to him. Of course various classes of men may travel with perfect propriety to the antipodes and even sojourn in them for indefinite periods. But this does not hold of the sons df baronets; Victorian fiction established an enduring convention on the point; and everybody realized that Sir George must have been a never- do-well and a bad hat. Very likely he had killed a fellow- prospector on the gold diggings or drowned in a billabong some rival in a lewd love; very likely he would be hunted down one day by the vengeance of a gang of bush-ranging associates whom he had betrayed.

Something of the sort would explain the fact that the master of Hazelwood slept with a shot-gun at his side; that he made his domestics go to church but never thought of going himself; that he had brought back to England a one- eyed butler who looked much more like a retired pirate than a respectable upper servant; that there had been a time when he kept mistresses in Hazelwood Hall instead of dis- creetly in cottages or the local market-town; that he had caused all ordinary baths to be removed from the house as insanitary and had installed showers instead. Yes, it was to be expected that something would happen to Sir George. But who could have guessed what?

His end has been sudden, unaccountable and violent. He himself, moreover, must have found its approaches ex- tremely surprising, since the features of the corpse displayed that expression of astounded and incredulous terror only assumed by persons who see that they are about to be mur- dered in the most pronouncedly bizarre way.

In fact this bad baronet -has died true to the traditions of his kind - mysteriously in his library, at midnight, while a great deal of snow was falling in the park outside.

It may be said then that in his death Sir George SImney has displayed — even If involuntarily - a sense of style. And people are obscurely grateful. This holds not merely of the police, who look to the affair to bring promotion, and of the journalists, who see in it the makings of a first-rate sensation. It holds of the neighbourhood in general, which has dimly hoped for something of the sort and would have been disappointed had Sir George simply taken to his bed, sent for old Dr Humberstone, weakened, rallied, weakened again and passed away under an oxygen tent. 'The human mind is avid of evidences of artistry in the frame of things, and has constructed a great deal of philosophy and theo- logy as a result.

Nevertheless it is a theologian - I am told - who con- stitutes the opposition in this matter. Perhaps the only per- son who altogether disapproves the fact and manner of Sir George's end is the Reverend Adrian Deamer, the vicar of Hazelwood. This is partly, no doubt, because Mr Deamer believes it to be particularly undesirable that a bad man should very suddenly die. But it is also because Mr Deamer feels that the affair holds depths which he is Impelled to fathom. And this distracts him from his proper business of visiting old women, of moderating by various persuasions 8 the incidence of illegitimacy in the parish (his chief occupation), and of preparing a weekly sermon which should pass muster with the more intelligent children in his congregation . . . What happened at Hazelwood? Mr Deamer feels that he can never really be easy until he knows.

Of course, a number of other people feel the same - and with more evident reason. In a community, mysterious homicide is a sensation, and, perhaps, an intellectual irritant inviting the more active-minded to scratch. But within a household such a calamity is felt chiefly in terms of suspense. It is like the presence of illness of an unknown degree of dangerousness - and there is the same badgering of authority to make pronouncements more definite than authority cares to make. The Hazelwood household wants to know what has happened. The police - local constables at first, but now grey-haired men like family solicitors - are extremely close and discreet. They rather resemble those eminent physicians, called down from London at several guineas a mile, who eventually pronounce that unless the patient goes on much as before he is almost sure to get either better or worse. In point of emotional reassurance (which is the relevant point) the local doctor proves the better bargain, after all. And at Hazelwood there are several who already regret the homely Sergeant Laffer, who confidently opined that the vagrant responsible for the deed would before long be picked up in a casual-ward or asleep under a haystack. And, indeed, does it not look like that? At any one of a dozen kitchen doors in the district the merest tramp might learn of fabled riches in Sir George Simney's study; he might mark the window and note the feasible climb. The light had been low, and therefore very probably indistin- guishable through the curtain; so might he not have broken in, expecting the place to himself - and when surprised have killed his challenger in just this way? For Sir George was hit on the head with a blunt instrument - such is the undeniable truth of the matter - and an assault so little refined seems to match with a passing tramp well enough. But then again - and here is the trouble - it matches with certain Simneys too; you have only to look at some of them to see not only that they could readily scale a trellised wall but also that a blunt instrument would be their choice every time. There is, of course, the fact that Sir George was hit from behind, whereas if you visualize your- self being bludgeoned by a Simney your mind's eye will certainly discern him as coming at you from straight ahead. But this is a point probably too refined for a policeman, even one who looked like a solicitor; and thus the reputa- tion for violence which Simneys in general bear, and of which by and at large they are rather proud, now has its distinctly embarrassing side. But there is more than this to the fact that Sir George was taken from the rear. There is a prior point - and one so obvious that it was even spotted immediately by Sir George's butler, the retired pirate. One is obliged to say *even' because this worthy, Alfred Owdon by name, is widely reputed to be devoid of anything distinguishing the human intelligence, and to equate indeed with the equine rather than the canine in mental rating . . . However this may be, Owdon it was who pointed out that a man sudden- ly hit on the head from behind ought not to look as Sir George looked. Theoretically it is no doubt possible that the last con- fused scurryings of sensation about the stricken brain of a murdered man may fortuitously imprint upon the features an expression conventionally associated with almost any emotional state. He may, for instance, simply look enor- mously pleased. But v^th no one does this abstract view survive the concrete reality of a glance at the dead man as he now lies in his coffin awaiting the pompous oblivion of the Simney family vault. Sir George, one knows, saw some- thing ranging between the extraordinary and the preter- natural; and then he was immediately hit on the head - from behind. 10 There seems to be very little sense in that. But even at this one is not done with the bothersomeness of the blow having come from the back. Such an approach - the grey- haired police detectives call it the a tergo approach, so evidently they are learned men - such an approach almost rules out the notion that the assailant struck out hastily upon being surprised. The direction of the stroke power- fully suggests a deliberate assault upon an unsuspecting man. And yet (once more) there is his expression ... It has become clear that the police like the case. It gives them something to chew on. They show no signs of going home. If they were asked to describe what has happened their answer - it is possible to suspect - would be Quite a lot. And, somehow, nobody relishes this. The notion that operating that single definite impact upon a human skull has been, so to speak, an engine or contrivance in which revolved wheels within wheels proves altogether disagree- able. Of course one knows whether one has, or has not, committed a specific crime of viplence. And yet as the investigation becomes complicated - and it has become that - it is difficult for any of those concerned to abide confidently even in this absolute security. The complications are like so many hazards on a pin-table. The ball — obscurely visioned as the future verdict of a judge and jury — comes rattling down. And the Simneys, however their individual knowledge and conscience stand, all feel Hke so many final goals, holes or pockets which may at any moment feel the fatal plop, I know, because I am one of them. I did not kill George. Indeed - and unlike most members of the family - I don't believe I ever even wanted to do so. But I feel like one of those pockets, all the same. Perhaps it is to ease a little of the tension that I am writing these notes.

II I am glad I have an alibu This is rational en