The Art-Music, Literature and Linguistics Forum
March 28, 2024, 12:05:08 pm
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Here you may discover hundreds of little-known composers, hear thousands of long-forgotten compositions, contribute your own rare recordings, and discuss the Arts, Literature and Linguistics in an erudite and decorous atmosphere full of freedom and delight.
 
  Home Help Search Gallery Staff List Login Register  

Production and reproduction

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Production and reproduction  (Read 1081 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
some guy
Guest
« on: July 13, 2009, 08:15:47 am »

Ian, Yes, I would use harmony to mean any sounds, pitched or unpitched, sounding simultaneously. So it has no necessary functional meaning the way I would use it. Harmony as it's usually used posits relationships that have structural significance, no? I don't see that having much relevance to contemporary practice.

increpatio, 1947 because by then the tape recorder had been perfected and Schaeffer's first "tape" pieces were done with it. That date ignores things like the 1930 turntable concert put on in Berlin by Hindemith and Krenek(?) and Cage's subsequent uses of turntables in pieces like Credo in US and of radios in Imaginary Landscape no. 1. So 1947 is probably too late. (I'm more and more unsatisfied by that date the more I think about it.)
Report Spam   Logged

Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum


Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy