The Art-Music, Literature and Linguistics Forum
June 17, 2024, 10:04:07 pm
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Here you may discover hundreds of little-known composers, hear thousands of long-forgotten compositions, contribute your own rare recordings, and discuss the Arts, Literature and Linguistics in an erudite and decorous atmosphere full of freedom and delight.
 
  Home Help Search Gallery Staff List Login Register  

Freedom to chat

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Freedom to chat  (Read 394 times)
Albion
Level 7
*******

Times thanked: 2750
Offline Offline

Posts: 1683


Frederic Cowen (1852-1935)


View Profile
« on: May 04, 2021, 06:53:04 pm »

Previously, for some unknown reason, members were only "allowed" to send a very limited number of Personal Messages (PMs) per day. This restriction has now been removed and members are free to communicate with each other unencumbered by this arbitrary imposition: it is a forum after all.

 :)
Report Spam   Logged

"A piece is worth your attention, and is itself for you praiseworthy, if it makes you feel you have not wasted your time over it." (Sydney Grew, 1922)

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

Albion
Level 7
*******

Times thanked: 2750
Offline Offline

Posts: 1683


Frederic Cowen (1852-1935)


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: July 04, 2022, 06:51:16 pm »

Several members have reported to me about problems with personal messaging on the forum. Sometimes messages are not being sent and sometimes not saved to outboxes. This may be a technical glitch, or possibly it may be a new restriction imposed by admin. If the former is the case, such things happen.  If the latter is the case, it is reprehensible and implies some kind of 1984 scenario where the moderator is reading your personal messages and deciding whether or not you are fit for purpose. As stated in my last post in this thread, PM means "Personal Message" - who cares if you're chatting about the price of eggs, the damp under your window-sill, who just won at Wimbledon or the present parlous state of "AMLF"? From long experience of egomaniac moderators over at UC, I would hate to see this forum go down the same puritanical path. I notice that the moderator here has now introduced a thread entitled "Unsuitable", presumably a place for him to dump posts before binning them - I xxxx well intend to fill that one up with my irrelevant rubbish...

« Last Edit: August 21, 2022, 11:09:38 pm by Admin » Report Spam   Logged

"A piece is worth your attention, and is itself for you praiseworthy, if it makes you feel you have not wasted your time over it." (Sydney Grew, 1922)
greek
Level 4
****

Times thanked: 15
Offline Offline

Posts: 495


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: July 04, 2022, 11:42:58 pm »

The reason for the limit on personal messages, which was imposed about eight years ago, is to prevent unauthorised advertisers from flooding the forum.

I can increase the limit to ten per day if there are really enough people who want that.

Of course I have no way of reading people's personal messages and even if I could I would not want to.

But please note that this was never intended to be a forum for "chatting".

Secondly, more than one member has begun to write posts about lavatories. This is not a suitable subject for a serious forum about art-music and linguistics. Nor is it a suitable subject for polite society or for merry-making, even. That is why two such posts have been moved to the "unsuitable category".

Report Spam   Logged

Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum


Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy