Ruth Gipps symphonies

The Art-Music, Literature and Linguistics Forum

April 18, 2024, 07:56:01 am

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

News: Here you may discover hundreds of little-known composers, hear thousands of long-forgotten compositions, contribute your own rare recordings, and discuss the Arts, Literature and Linguistics in an erudite and decorous atmosphere full of freedom and delight.

The Art-Music, Literature and Linguistics Forum > Forum > Assorted items > Commercial recordings (vintage, new and forthcoming) > Ruth Gipps symphonies > Message #33068

Pages: [1] 2 3 Go Down

« previous next »

	Author	Topic: Ruth Gipps symphonies (Read 3900 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Expi

Level 3

Times thanked: 11
Offline

Offline

Posts: 101

Re: Ruth Gipps symphonies

« on: August 07, 2018, 05:24:15 pm »

Sorry but whats wrong with terms like not relevant or redundant? Aren't they self-explanatory? Not relevant means without any importance for musical history and redundant means superfluous (People had better spent time for something useful than recording boring music). What about the freedom of speech in this Forum?


	Report Spam Logged

Here is a short list of relevant british composers:

Pages: [1] 2 3 Go Up

« previous next »

Jump to: