The inadmissibility of "interpretation."

The Art-Music, Literature and Linguistics Forum

April 16, 2024, 11:14:18 am

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

News: Here you may discover hundreds of little-known composers, hear thousands of long-forgotten compositions, contribute your own rare recordings, and discuss the Arts, Literature and Linguistics in an erudite and decorous atmosphere full of freedom and delight.

The Art-Music, Literature and Linguistics Forum > Forum > ARCHIVED TOPICS > Miscellaneous topics > Performance and technique > The inadmissibility of "interpretation." > Message #18709

Pages: [1] Go Down

« previous next »

	Author	Topic: The inadmissibility of "interpretation." (Read 795 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Vandermolen

Level 4

Times thanked: 4
Offline

Offline

Posts: 307

Re: The inadmissibility of "interpretation."

« on: February 25, 2014, 08:40:11 pm »

The Seventh symphony is one of my favourites. I didn't know that Richard Hickox had refused to record the last three Arnold symphonies - interesting news indeed. As a rule I prefer the odd numbered symphonies + No 6.


	Report Spam Logged

Pages: [1] Go Up

« previous next »

Jump to: